Is God really in Control?
May 25, 2025
Today’s first reading gives us a glimpse into the workings of the first Church Council held in Jerusalem. For the sake of brevity, the Lectionary reading only gives us the first part of the incident and the conclusion, and leaves out the process that was followed. I have included the missing section because when we read the entirety of the story, what strikes me is the role of Peter as the leader of the Church.
Clearly right from the time Jesus gave him a new name and said he would build his Church on him as a rock, (Mathew 16:18), Peter, was recognized as the head of the Apostles and later as head of the Church. And yet even though he earlier seems to be inclined to the position that the Jewish religious laws (e.g. circumcision) ought to be also followed by the new community built around Jesus (Galatians 2), today’s story tells us that he doesn’t impose this view on others, and he is quite open to other views. And so during this Council, he shows no self importance, no need to assert control and publicly gives in to the position of Paul. This self-effacement of Peter is also evidenced when we realise that the Council ends with James making the final pronouncement, and not Peter. In another instance, Peter even admits that he doesn’t fully understand some of the things that the highly educated Paul teaches, but he still asks the Christian communities to respect the latter (2 Peter 3:16). Again, when Peter visits Cornelius because the Roman has received a message from God to invite him as the leader of the new Jesus community, Peter shows great humility. Because while he is actually preaching the Gospel of Jesus, even before he has finished, the Holy Spirit comes down on those listening to him, and Peter pauses in his teaching and asks in wonder: Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have? (Acts 10:47) He is not upset that God does not wait for him as head of the Church to officially admit Cornelius and his family into the Church community, but just acknowledges the reality and moves ahead from there. In all these incidents Peter never seems to experience any unhappiness at having his role as leader of the Jesus Community being undermined just because he doesn’t have control over the outcomes. So it looks like Peter doesn’t seem to want to control the rules or rituals or any kind of formal entry into the Christian community. And yet he was indisputably the leader.
His kind of leadership seems very consistent with Jesus’, who also did not feel the need to assert control. When Jesus was in a position of power, as with his own disciples, he does not control them And so even when he suspects that Judas is going to do something terrible against him, he tells him to go and do what he wants to do (John 13:27). Again, when he knows Peter is going to deny him, he does not berate him or exile him or scold him, but just sadly warns him, and then lets him free. Furthermore, Jesus is willing to hand over his power to his disciples, empowering them to preach and heal,(Luke 10:1), for it is more important to him that the Kingdom of God is preached, rather than that he be seen as the Messiah. In fact, as we know from many incidents in the Gospels, he has no interest in being recognised as the Christ. On the other hand when Jesus finds himself in a position of weakness, as in front of the Sanhedrin, Pilate or Herod, when he knows that they could cause harm to him, even cause his death, he speaks truth to power. Peter too, the frightened person who denied Jesus, finds within himself the ability to speak truth to power when he is brought before the Sanhedrin (Acts 4:17-20), and openly refuses to follow their clear orders.
Thus when they are in positions of leadership, neither Jesus or Peter try to control others, but rather find ways to take everyone with them, even if they are not particularly happy with the way others are functioning or even disagree with their thought process. On the other hand, when they are in positions of weakness, they are willing to challenge those in power even if they may suffer much as a result.
And yet today in many parts of the world, the call for what we call a ‘strong leader’ often seems to be a call for one who is the complete antithesis of a Jesus-kind of leader. This kind of ‘strong leader’ uses power, quite differently from how Jesus and Peter used their power. For example a powerful political leader is today seen as one who can be decisive in choosing the way for us, one whom everybody obeys, one who will protect us from other ‘bad guys/nations’ by attacking them and showing them that we are greater than them, and who will thus ensure we make our own country great again. This seems to be the common understanding of what it means to be a strong and powerful leader.
But this understanding of leader, is not only found out there in the political world. It is so ingrained within us as human beings, that we can see this even in the early centuries of our own Church history, when a struggle for this kind of controlling power surfaced in the Church. As a result, from as early as the second century onwards, we see such a struggle between the five most important Sees in the early centuries, i.e. Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem, each vying to claim superiority and power over the others. And eventually, over a number of centuries, the Bishop of Rome was finally seen as having power over all the Sees, as we have it today. And, of course this understanding of power as control is also found in our Church today, with both clergy and laity fostering a situation where the former exercise control in ‘church’ matters, and the latter allow themselves to be controlled.
We can assume that just as Peter got his understanding of what it means to be a leader from Jesus, Jesus got his understanding of power from how he experienced God his Father using power. And if we are honest about it, for most of us, the God “who causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous”. (Mathew 5:45) hardly seems to be in control of our world. Our own experience will tell us that God doesn’t always punish the wicked. In fact seemingly good people seem to suffer as much (even more?) as those who seem to be evil. Moreover, very often, despite our prayers and supplications, oftentimes God does not come in power to save us. God’s power is therefore seen as weakness, not as strength or as powerful. This difficulty in understanding this kind of power of God was a difficulty also faced by the early Church which was clearly expecting Jesus to come back in power, while some of them were still alive (Mathew 16:28), at which time they expected him to have control over the whole world. It was in trying to respond to this difficulty in understanding how God uses power, that Paul had to remind his readers that “God’s weakness is stronger than human strength. (1 Cor. 1: 25).
What did Paul mean when he said this? Perhaps an analogy can help us think about this. Think of the power of AIR or WATER. Both are completely yielding, we push them and they move out of our way. We hardly pay attention to them except when we are out of breath or very thirsty - just like many of us do with God. And yet, we know that without AIR or WATER, we cannot survive. That is power. We also know that finally air and water find their way, they can never be overcome. They yield only to finally remain the constant that they are in our lives. Think again of all the pollution we release into the air and into the waters, and yet our atmosphere, our oceans, remain life-giving. That is power. This power of AIR and WATER is so different from our own understanding of power.
Such an understanding of power is extremely difficult for us to internalise. Much less do we know how to exercise this kind of power - that is an apparent weakness - in our own lives?
Comments
Post a Comment